| Previous | Next |
| NS_I_RESTRIPE_START | NS_I_RESTRIPE_DISK_OUT |
NS_I_RESTRIPE_DONE
NS_I_RESTRIPE_DONE — 0x400D0194
A productive reading of completed content restripe begins at the component boundary where the redistribution workflow reached its completion state.
Place in the component lifecycle
Restriping redistributes media-server placement and ownership across disks or Content Servers. In the context of completed content restripe, it is a coordinated topology operation rather than a generic filesystem optimization, so pre/post stripe maps, peer identity, capacity, and representative media reads are the relevant evidence. Locate the first component changing state in this condition and distinguish later summary errors.
Important boundary. Completion means the workflow ended; it does not by itself prove that every destination copy or peer view is correct. Record the exact constant and returning API.
Build a reliable incident timeline
| Incident fact | What it separates |
|---|---|
| Matching start event, elapsed time, participating disks/servers, and final stripe map | Shows whether the status is expected information, a warning, or the first failure in the event sequence. |
| Objects moved, objects skipped, capacity balance, and any warnings | Ties the message to one server object and one transition instead of a later retry. |
| Post-operation peer inventory and link state | Separates configuration or identity from storage, parser, network, or lifecycle state. |
| Sample content reads from each destination disk | Provides a stable before/after comparison for the proposed correction. |
Prefer identifiers, versions, counts, hashes, state transitions, and redacted paths; media content, credentials, keys, and user data are rarely needed in routine incident logs.
Tests that change one variable
- Compare pre/post stripe ownership using the authoritative server inventory. Use a disposable publishing point or maintenance window when the test can alter server or storage state.
- Restart one participating server and verify it reloads the final map. Retain a known-good stream, session, or server object so a broad restart is not mistaken for repair of the reported failure.
- Read content that moved and content that stayed in place. Record the first server event, object state, or return value that changes.
Stop after the first comparison that moves the boundary and diagnose the replacement status independently instead of accumulating unrelated server changes.
Interpretation boundaries
- Known-good comparison succeeds: isolate the production object or configuration associated with the failing operation.
- Same failure on the control: investigate the shared server, plug-in, storage, topology, or network layer before changing media content.
- Different status after one change: preserve both results; the first rejected condition was removed, but the operation is not yet proved complete.
Repair and regression proof
Correction: Investigate any inventory discrepancy from preserved pre/post maps rather than immediately starting another restripe. Keep the original server configuration, event sequence, object inventory, input hash, and topology snapshot so the change can be reversed and explained.
Accept the repair only when all peers load the same final map, moved content streams correctly, and no corrective restripe starts automatically. Repeat the original supported operation under the original identity and object state; a simplified media file, replacement server, new session, or different client is useful comparison evidence but not final regression proof.
Technical references
These sources describe the API, service architecture, and status values relevant to this diagnosis: Check version-specific behavior against the Windows Media Services and SDK generation that produced the event.
- Microsoft Open Specifications: HRESULT values — defines the formal status or component boundary.
- Microsoft: Windows Media Services 9 Series SDK — documents the relevant API or lifecycle.
- Microsoft: Windows Media Services SDK architecture — provides the architecture, format, or protocol context.
- Microsoft: programming the Windows Media server object model — supports the controlled verification criteria.
Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.