What does HRESULT 0x8009300A (OSS_LIMITED) mean?

 
Previous Next
OSS_PDU_MISMATCH OSS_BAD_PTR

OSS_LIMITED

OSS_LIMITED (0x8009300A) is an OSS ASN.1 runtime result for implementation limit exceeded while decoding. A syntactically recognizable value exceeds a runtime capacity, such as an INTEGER magnitude, nesting depth, or representation supported by that build. Because value length, magnitude, and nesting at failure is central to this condition, Microsoft’s HRESULT range and the OSS Nokalva return-code documentation should be read together. Start the investigation by recording runtime edition and generated representation options, then separate the encoded value from generated artifacts, call arguments, and the runtime package actually loaded by the process.

What the return code narrows down

At the implementation limit exceeded while decoding boundary, capture the first OSS function returning the value and note whether the operation was encode, decode, copy, compare, constraint validation, or trace setup. Preserve the selected PDU, encoding rules, and protocol limits expected by the application; otherwise an outer certificate or security wrapper may hide the useful codec result behind a generic failure.

Build a useful capture

RecordDiagnostic value
value length, magnitude, and nesting at failureLocates the concrete message, allocation, module, or API boundary
runtime edition and generated representation optionsSeparates payload-dependent behavior from build and process state
protocol limits expected by the applicationMakes the comparison reproducible without rewriting the original artifact

Neighboring statuses: the result

A schema constraint violation is reported separately; LIMITED can arise even when the abstract ASN.1 type has no such narrow bound.

Test one variable at a time

  1. decode a value just below the observed boundary
  2. enforce a protocol quota before ASN.1 allocation
  3. compare another supported runtime build without changing schema

Instrumentation

Record the full 32-bit HRESULT and lower OSS return number together with operation direction, symbolic PDU, encoding rule, byte count, and generated-table identifier. Where value length, magnitude, and nesting at failure can expose sensitive content, a hash plus a bounded structural excerpt is safer than the complete payload. Use runtime edition and generated representation options together with OSS module paths and versions logged once per process so packaging differences can be correlated without flooding normal diagnostics.

Keep the original bytes or object graph unchanged while testing decode a value just below the observed boundary. A change in runtime edition and generated representation options after reload, plugin replacement, restart, or schema deployment is evidence about runtime state, not permission to discard the reproducer. When protocol limits expected by the application points to one message, retain a cryptographic hash and the smallest safe sample instead of logging certificate, subscriber, credential, or private-key material.

Decision matrix

Controlled observationConclusion it supports
decode a value just below the observed boundaryA changed outcome isolates the first proposed control instead of a blind retry
value length, magnitude, and nesting at failure differs between success and failureThe difference localizes the implementation limit exceeded while decoding boundary before unrelated settings are changed
An independent decoder accepts the same artifactInspect generated schema, selected rules, ABI, and optional OSS modules before declaring the bytes invalid
A fresh control object changes the outcomeInvestigate initialization, lifecycle, allocator ownership, configuration mutation, and concurrent access

Verify the repair: the result

Choose a representation that supports the required range or reject oversized inputs at the protocol boundary. A recovery test built around decode a value just below the observed boundary should replay the same operation under the same schema and encoding rule, retain one deliberately invalid control, and verify ownership and cleanup after both outcomes. Success after an unexamined retry is not proof that value length, magnitude, and nesting at failure now satisfies the codec contract.

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.