What does HRESULT 0x8009300F (OSS_BAD_TABLE) mean?

 
Previous Next
OSS_MEM_ERROR OSS_TOO_LONG

OSS_BAD_TABLE

OSS_BAD_TABLE (0x8009300F) is an OSS ASN.1 runtime result for corrupt encoder or decoder control table. The runtime cannot use the generated control information, usually because the OssControl object or table pointer has been damaged or initialized incorrectly. Because address and identity of the control table is central to this condition, Microsoft’s HRESULT range and the OSS Nokalva return-code documentation should be read together. Start the investigation by recording result of the initialization function, then separate the encoded value from generated artifacts, call arguments, and the runtime package actually loaded by the process.

Avoid the wrong workaround: OSS_BAD_TABLE

NULL_TBL is specifically a null table pointer; BAD_TABLE means a non-null table fails integrity or interpretation checks.

Interpretation at runtime

At the corrupt encoder or decoder control table boundary, capture the first OSS function returning the value and note whether the operation was encode, decode, copy, compare, constraint validation, or trace setup. Preserve the selected PDU, encoding rules, and write history for the OssControl storage; otherwise an outer certificate or security wrapper may hide the useful codec result behind a generic failure.

Diagnostic record

RecordDiagnostic value
address and identity of the control tableLocates the concrete message, allocation, module, or API boundary
result of the initialization functionSeparates payload-dependent behavior from build and process state
write history for the OssControl storageMakes the comparison reproducible without rewriting the original artifact

Keep the original bytes or object graph unchanged while testing create a new control object in isolated storage. A change in result of the initialization function after reload, plugin replacement, restart, or schema deployment is evidence about runtime state, not permission to discard the reproducer. When write history for the OssControl storage points to one message, retain a cryptographic hash and the smallest safe sample instead of logging certificate, subscriber, credential, or private-key material.

Small experiments with high signal

  1. create a new control object in isolated storage
  2. compare table bytes with the deployed artifact
  3. remove post-initialization writes to the control structure

Decision matrix

Controlled observationConclusion it supports
create a new control object in isolated storageA changed outcome isolates the first proposed control instead of a blind retry
address and identity of the control table differs between success and failureThe difference localizes the corrupt encoder or decoder control table boundary before unrelated settings are changed
An independent decoder accepts the same artifactInspect generated schema, selected rules, ABI, and optional OSS modules before declaring the bytes invalid
A fresh control object changes the outcomeInvestigate initialization, lifecycle, allocator ownership, configuration mutation, and concurrent access

Instrumentation

Record the full 32-bit HRESULT and lower OSS return number together with operation direction, symbolic PDU, encoding rule, byte count, and generated-table identifier. Where address and identity of the control table can expose sensitive content, a hash plus a bounded structural excerpt is safer than the complete payload. Use result of the initialization function together with OSS module paths and versions logged once per process so packaging differences can be correlated without flooding normal diagnostics.

Proof of recovery: the result

Treat generated control data as immutable, initialize once as documented, and replace any mixed or modified artifact. A recovery test built around create a new control object in isolated storage should replay the same operation under the same schema and encoding rule, retain one deliberately invalid control, and verify ownership and cleanup after both outcomes. Success after an unexamined retry is not proof that address and identity of the control table now satisfies the codec contract.

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.