What does HRESULT 0x8009301D (OSS_TABLE_MISMATCH) mean?

 
Previous Next
OSS_TRACE_FILE_ALREADY_OPEN OSS_TYPE_NOT_SUPPORTED

OSS_TABLE_MISMATCH

OSS_TABLE_MISMATCH (0x8009301D) is an OSS ASN.1 runtime result for requested type absent from the active control table. The type being encoded is not defined by the generated table attached to the current runtime context. Because symbolic type and numeric selector is central to this condition, Microsoft’s HRESULT range and the OSS Nokalva return-code documentation should be read together. Start the investigation by recording schema module used to generate the table, then separate the encoded value from generated artifacts, call arguments, and the runtime package actually loaded by the process.

Locate the exact codec boundary

At the requested type absent from the active control table boundary, capture the first OSS function returning the value and note whether the operation was encode, decode, copy, compare, constraint validation, or trace setup. Preserve the selected PDU, encoding rules, and control table identity chosen at runtime; otherwise an outer certificate or security wrapper may hide the useful codec result behind a generic failure.

Keep the original bytes or object graph unchanged while testing encode a type known to exist in that table. A change in schema module used to generate the table after reload, plugin replacement, restart, or schema deployment is evidence about runtime state, not permission to discard the reproducer. When control table identity chosen at runtime points to one message, retain a cryptographic hash and the smallest safe sample instead of logging certificate, subscriber, credential, or private-key material.

Evidence worth preserving

RecordDiagnostic value
symbolic type and numeric selectorLocates the concrete message, allocation, module, or API boundary
schema module used to generate the tableSeparates payload-dependent behavior from build and process state
control table identity chosen at runtimeMakes the comparison reproducible without rewriting the original artifact

A controlled way to reproduce it

  1. encode a type known to exist in that table
  2. compare generated headers with the loaded control artifact
  3. look for cross-module context reuse

What not to confuse it with: the result

PDU_RANGE rejects a selector outside the top-level range; TABLE_MISMATCH often exposes a valid application type paired with the wrong generated table.

Instrumentation

Record the full 32-bit HRESULT and lower OSS return number together with operation direction, symbolic PDU, encoding rule, byte count, and generated-table identifier. Where symbolic type and numeric selector can expose sensitive content, a hash plus a bounded structural excerpt is safer than the complete payload. Use schema module used to generate the table together with OSS module paths and versions logged once per process so packaging differences can be correlated without flooding normal diagnostics.

Decision matrix

Controlled observationConclusion it supports
encode a type known to exist in that tableA changed outcome isolates the first proposed control instead of a blind retry
symbolic type and numeric selector differs between success and failureThe difference localizes the requested type absent from the active control table boundary before unrelated settings are changed
An independent decoder accepts the same artifactInspect generated schema, selected rules, ABI, and optional OSS modules before declaring the bytes invalid
A fresh control object changes the outcomeInvestigate initialization, lifecycle, allocator ownership, configuration mutation, and concurrent access

Exit criteria: the result

Route each generated value to its matching control context and deploy schema artifacts atomically. A recovery test built around encode a type known to exist in that table should replay the same operation under the same schema and encoding rule, retain one deliberately invalid control, and verify ownership and cleanup after both outcomes. Success after an unexamined retry is not proof that symbolic type and numeric selector now satisfies the codec contract.

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.