| Previous | Next |
| COMQC_E_QUEUING_SERVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE | COMQC_E_BAD_MESSAGE |
COMQC_E_NO_IPERSISTSTREAM
Treat this HRESULT as a marker for queued-call serialization contract, not as a request for a generic restart or reinstall. It is returned when COM+ cannot marshal the interface call into a queued message because the required persistence/recording path does not support IPersistStream.
The contract behind the HRESULT
Queued Components cross several independent layers: call recording, MSMQ transport, message authentication, listener playback, and execution of the business method when diagnosing queued-call serialization contract. Message ID, queue format name, original sender, any mover or requeuer, and the COM+ application version are the keys that join those layers without treating every queue symptom as the same fault for an incident involving queued-call serialization contract.
Do not collapse this result into a nearby status. MSMQ availability cannot repair an interface that cannot be serialized into the queued-component recording format. For queued-call serialization contract, compare the lifecycle stage, object identity, caller context, and first returning API—not only the English wording or the final dialog shown to the user.
Diagnostic worksheet
| Incident evidence | Question it answers |
|---|---|
| Interface IID, proxy/stub/type-library metadata, and object implementing persistence | Shows whether the proposed correction changes the first failing boundary during verification of queued-call serialization contract. |
| Method parameter types and any interface/object parameters | Locates the exact attempt and prevents evidence from a later retry from being mixed into it when diagnosing queued-call serialization contract. |
| IPersistStream QueryInterface result and Save/Load behavior | Separates a contract or configuration defect from a transient environmental failure in an incident involving queued-call serialization contract. |
| Recorded message size and failure point before MSMQ submission | Provides a stable comparison point for a controlled reproduction before changing the state involved in queued-call serialization contract. |
Identifiers, timestamps, versions, counts, state flags, hashes, and redacted paths normally provide enough correlation when diagnosing queued-call serialization contract. Keep credentials, private keys, message bodies, recovery material, and personal data out of routine incident logs for an incident involving queued-call serialization contract.
Reproduce the boundary safely
- Replace complex object parameters with simple value data in a test interface; keep every other input fixed and record the first event that differs from the failing run.
- Exercise IPersistStream Save/Load round-trip independently; use a disposable or backed-up environment when the comparison changes boot, security, device, queue, or encryption state.
- Compare a known queueable interface from the same application; retain one negative control so that a broad workaround is not mistaken for a root-cause correction.
For queued-call serialization contract, if the failure disappears after a broad restart, treat that as a clue about lifetime or state, not as proof of repair. Reproduce the original queued-call serialization contract operation with targeted instrumentation before closing the incident.
Nearby states and false leads
Use the outcomes to narrow the layer rather than to accumulate unrelated fixes for queued-call serialization contract:
| Observed result | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| The minimal or known-good comparison succeeds | For queued-call serialization contract, the platform path is available; concentrate on the production object, arguments, identity, policy, or lifecycle state described above. |
| The control fails at the same first operation | For queued-call serialization contract, failure of the control points below application-specific data; preserve service, provider, operating-system, or host evidence before changing the environment. |
| A different HRESULT appears after one controlled change | The queued-call serialization contract boundary moved; diagnose the new status separately rather than treating it as confirmation that the entire operation is fixed. |
Closing the incident
A defensible correction is specific to the evidence: Redesign the queueable contract around durable value parameters or correctly implement deterministic IPersistStream persistence. For queued-call serialization contract, preserve the pre-change export or trace and document the exact configuration, build, identity, object, or policy that changed.
Close the incident only when recorded calls serialize, deserialize, and replay across process restart and version compatibility tests. For queued-call serialization contract, repeat the original supported operation under the original identity and object state, then retain one deliberate boundary or negative test. A result from a different account, simplified input, replacement object, or unrelated machine is useful comparison data for queued-call serialization contract, but it is not regression proof.
Technical references
Use these sources for the formal contract, then combine them with evidence from the returning application or service for queued-call serialization contract:
- Microsoft: COM error codes.
- Microsoft: using the queue moniker.
- Microsoft: COM+ queued components tasks.
- Microsoft: Message Queuing.
Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.