What does HRESULT 0x80EE0005 (RTC_E_SIP_HEADER_NOT_PRESENT) mean?

 
Previous Next
RTC_E_SIP_PARSE_FAILED RTC_E_SDP_NOT_PRESENT

RTC_E_SIP_HEADER_NOT_PRESENT

Where the state changes: RTC_E_SIP_HEADER_NOT_PRESENT

Read this result as an RTC state-machine result: at this point in parsing, constructing, or reconciling SIP signaling and the SDP offer/answer carried by it, an RTC operation requires a SIP header that is absent from the parsed message.

Log this result as 0x80EE0005 in the RTC interface facility 0xEE, not only as a signed decimal; the facility distinguishes local RTC validation from a response status mapped by the stack.

The first useful check is to identify the method/status and exact required header, then inspect whether a proxy removed or failed to generate it. The result must be separated from nearby conditions because the message can be syntactically parseable while still lacking a header required by that transaction or extension.

Telemetry and packet evidence

  • Code-specific proof: identify the method/status and exact required header, then inspect whether a proxy removed or failed to generate it.
  • Addressing context: start-line plus header names.
  • RTC callback state: Content-Type and Content-Length.
  • Transaction boundary: SDP o= version and c= address.
  • Media or profile detail: each m= line and codec mapping.

Protocol and object state

RTC areaSIP message and SDP negotiation
Condition to provean RTC operation requires a SIP header that is absent from the parsed message
Objects to correlateSIP start-line and headers, message body framing, SDP session and media sections, offer/answer generation
Safe corrective directionfix message generation or intermediary policy and reject the message without inventing a header value

Interpreting it requires both of these facts: SIP transaction state and media negotiation are separate: a syntactically valid SIP request can still contain absent or unacceptable SDP; also, the result branch assumes that An SDP update must be checked against the previous offer/answer state, not merely parsed as a standalone text document.

Actions that do not address this condition

  • Do not log credentials or an unredacted SDP body from production calls.
  • Do not repair malformed signaling by silently deleting unknown headers or media sections.

Step-by-step isolation

  1. Confirm the distinction that the message can be syntactically parseable while still lacking a header required by that transaction or extension.
  2. Start a fresh operation after you fix message generation or intermediary policy and reject the message without inventing a header value, and compare its final state with the failing run.

Recovery

The owning RTC component should fix message generation or intermediary policy and reject the message without inventing a header value; it should also settle or cancel its previous operation before callers begin a replacement.

Example: A transfer flow receives a REFER without the Refer-To header needed to identify the target.

Comparison with adjacent codes

RTC_E_SIP_UDP_SIZE_EXCEEDEDthe serialized SIP datagram exceeds the size accepted by the RTC UDP transport path
RTC_E_SIP_STREAM_NOT_PRESENTcode attempted to stop or remove a stream that is not active in the current session generation
RTC_E_SDP_UPDATE_FAILEDa new SDP description is incompatible with the prior negotiated offer/answer state

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.