| Previous | Next |
| RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_USER_URI | RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_SERVER_ADDRESS |
RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_SERVER
Protocol boundary: RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_SERVER
This result belongs to the RTC provisioning profile validation boundary area of RTC and identifies the provisioning profile omits the required server field.
This result carries 0x80EE0034 in the RTC interface facility 0xEE; store the result value at the first RTC callback or method boundary, before retry logic replaces it with a broader timeout or connection message.
Collect enough state to parse the profile with schema-aware diagnostics and identify the owning provision, user, server, or session element; the result evidence should demonstrate why a missing field differs from a present field whose value or cross-field combination is invalid.
Protocol and object boundary
| RTC area | RTC provisioning profile validation boundary |
|---|---|
| Objects to correlate | profile XML, provision/user/server/session elements, registrar and proxy roles, transport and authentication method |
| Condition to prove | the provisioning profile omits the required server field |
| Safe corrective direction | supply the authoritative server value and regenerate the profile rather than inserting a guessed placeholder |
CreateProfile validates the provisioning schema and cross-field constraints; a field can be present yet still be unusable with the chosen transport or role; the second rule relevant to this result is that The enabled profile selected for a call must support both the destination and the requested session type.
How to prove the condition
- Record this result and
0x80EE0034at the first RTC method or event that returns it. - Identify the client, profile, session, participant, presence object, terminal, or port manager that owns this it occurrence.
- Place it in its exact phase: parsing, discovery, transport, authentication, profile validation, dialog control, media, roaming, registration, redirection, or final response handling.
- prove the condition by ensuring the trace can parse the profile with schema-aware diagnostics and identify the owning provision, user, server, or session element.
- Apply one controlled change for this HRESULT: supply the authoritative server value and regenerate the profile rather than inserting a guessed placeholder; then verify the result return value and resulting RTC state.
Correlate wire data and RTC events for this HRESULT; for this HRESULT, either source alone can misclassify local validation as remote rejection, or a remote status as a local media or profile failure.
Minimum incident record
Capture the first result before retry, reconnect, profile re-enable, or teardown changes the evidence; associate it with one RTC object generation and one transaction or media transition.
- Code-specific proof for this HRESULT: parse the profile with schema-aware diagnostics and identify the owning provision, user, server, or session element.
- Owning object for this HRESULT: user URI and profile key hash.
- Wire evidence for this HRESULT: server role/address/transport.
- Lifecycle generation for this HRESULT: authentication method.
For privacy-safe analysis of it, preserve protocol structure rather than payload content; for this HRESULT, authentication values, complete addresses, buddy lists, and bodies should be redacted or hashed under policy.
Actions that do not address this condition
- The following shortcut is unsafe for this HRESULT: do not log passwords or provisioning secrets from profile XML.
- also do not insert placeholder values solely to pass schema validation.
- Keep it intact through exception and UI layers; a generic parameter or network message is insufficient for diagnosis.
Correct application response
The owning RTC component should supply the authoritative server value and regenerate the profile rather than inserting a guessed placeholder; for this HRESULT, it should also settle or cancel its previous operation before callers begin a replacement.
A retry after it is safe only after the prior transaction’s outcome is reconciled; after it, reissuing state-changing requests while the peer result is unknown can create contradictory RTC state.
Example for this HRESULT: A provisioning template creates a profile without server and RTC rejects it before the profile can be enabled.
Nearby failure modes
Use the following contrast when classifying it: it is tied to the condition “the provisioning profile omits the required server field”; preserve that producing boundary before choosing recovery; for this HRESULT, similar subsystem names do not imply identical recovery.
RTC_E_NO_PROFILE | RTC cannot select an enabled profile suitable for the requested destination and session type |
|---|---|
RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_KEY | the provisioning profile omits the required key field |
RTC_E_PROFILE_INVALID_SERVER_AUTHMETHOD | the profile contains an invalid server authmethod value or combination |
Facility equality is not semantic equality; route each contrasted value through its own recovery branch.
Verification after a fix
Verify the result fix with a minimal deterministic case that reaches “the provisioning profile omits the required server field”; the failing the case must assert the HRESULT and post-failure state; the passing case should alter one input and confirm both protocol outcome and cleanup.
Technical references
- IRTCClientProvisioning::CreateProfile — definitions relevant when reproducing it.
- IRTCProfile server fields — API or protocol rules used to interpret it.
- Microsoft RTC return constants — authoritative context for the boundary.
- SIP and TEL URLs — definitions relevant when reproducing it.
Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.