What does HRESULT 0x83750008 (WEB_E_INVALID_JSON_NUMBER) mean?

 
Previous Next
WEB_E_INVALID_JSON_STRING WEB_E_JSON_VALUE_NOT_FOUND

WEB_E_INVALID_JSON_NUMBER

WEB_E_INVALID_JSON_NUMBER (0x83750008) identifies JSON number outside the accepted lexical or numeric domain. The parser encounters a numeric token that is not a valid JSON number or cannot be represented by the consuming API. Record network reachability, HTTP status, and parser acceptance as separate layers.

Inspect spelling before conversion

Keep the exact token: leading plus signs, leading zeros, missing digits around a decimal point, incomplete exponents, NaN, and Infinity are not interchangeable with ordinary JSON numbers.

Lexical versus range failure

BoundaryQuestion
GrammarDoes the token match minus, integer, optional fraction, and optional exponent?
Range and precisionCan the destination type represent the magnitude without overflow or unacceptable loss?
Producer intentWas an identifier mistakenly serialized as a number instead of a string?

Reproduce narrowly

  1. Parse the raw token without first converting through JavaScript or a spreadsheet
  2. Test the nearest supported magnitude
  3. Compare integer and floating-point destination APIs

Repair

Emit RFC-compliant number syntax and model large identifiers or exact decimals with a representation the protocol explicitly supports.

JSON number grammar is narrower than many languages

JSON does not admit NaN, positive or negative infinity, hexadecimal notation, a leading plus sign, or unnecessary leading zeroes. Even grammatically valid exponents can exceed the numeric range expected by the target property, so preserve both the token spelling and the destination type.

Two independent axes

ComparisonWhat it reveals
Same artifact, different implementationWhether the representation is independently rejected
Known-good artifact, same environmentWhether the local stack fails without production-specific input
Original operation, one isolated changeWhether the proposed correction controls the observed result
Deliberate boundary violationWhether validation remains active after the change

Safe logging

Capture this result with the operation, byte count, parser or statement position, and contract version, replacing sensitive bodies with hashes and bounded excerpts without losing the state needed to reproduce the event.

Representation pipeline

StageEvidence to retain
Producer modelSerializer, contract revision, omission, ordering, escaping, and numeric options
Transport bytesContent type, charset, content encoding, declared length, and parser-visible bytes
Parser stateOffset, line or token path, expected construct, and actual construct
Projection layerSchema, object mapper, or lookup converting XML or JSON into fields

Normalization risks

Pretty-printing, reserialization, charset conversion, or browser copying can erase the condition producing this result; hash the original body, apply deterministic redaction, and retain both received and decompressed forms when content encoding is involved.

Focused regression corpus

  • A minimal document containing no unrelated members
  • A valid document at the nearest relevant boundary
  • A contract-version variant showing strict or forward-compatible behavior
  • A transport variant proving framing and character decoding are not hidden causes

Fix ownership

LayerWhen it owns the correction
TransportChange framing, decompression, or character decoding only when captured bytes prove this layer altered the representation
ParserChange syntax handling only when the raw token or markup violates the selected format
ProjectionChange requiredness, path, ordering, or value conversion only after parsing succeeds
ProducerCorrect serialization when the emitted representation contradicts the published contract

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.