| Previous | Next |
| CI_E_PROPERTY_TOOLARGE | CI_E_CORRUPT_FWIDX |
CI_E_CLIENT_FILTER_ABORT
CI_E_CLIENT_FILTER_ABORT — 0xC0041824
The built-in message is only the immediate status; the useful boundary is that the client or hosting workflow cancelled filtering of the current object before normal completion.
The contract behind the code
CiDaemon hosts IFilter components that emit text chunks and value-type properties. In the context of client-requested filter abort, filter CLSID/version, source hash, chunk/property identity, buffer size, cancellation, and a clean-catalog comparison separate a bad document from a faulty filter or catalog. Locate the first component changing state in client-requested filter abort and distinguish later summary errors.
Important boundary. This result does not by itself identify a defective IFilter; the abort may be an intentional client lifecycle action. Record the exact constant and returning API.
Diagnostic worksheet
| Capture | Diagnostic question |
|---|---|
| Document/work ID, client component, cancellation reason, filter, and chunk/progress point | Ties the result to one catalog, source document, filter, or query object. |
| Shutdown, timeout, user cancellation, scope deletion, or superseding update event | Separates catalog state from source data, filter output, and client lifecycle. |
| Whether partial index/property data was committed or discarded | Provides a stable before/after comparison for rebuilding or correcting the index path. |
| Retry policy and document generation after cancellation | Shows whether the first inconsistency arose during filtering, storage, administration, or enumeration. |
A catalog snapshot, source inventory, query definition, and redacted event sequence are usually more useful than copying indexed documents.
Useful comparisons
- Filter the same object without client cancellation. Use a copied catalog or a small disposable catalog when the test can rebuild derived state.
- Trigger a controlled cancel and verify cleanup semantics. Retain a known-good document or query so a broad catalog rebuild is not mistaken for repair of the reported failure.
- Check whether repeated aborts correlate with one file type or client timeout. Record the first filter, catalog, merge, query, or enumeration result that changes.
Do not use repeated enumeration or service restarts as the main test; a later success can reflect a fresh query object, completed merge, restarted filter host, or rebuilt derived state.
Read the result in context
- Known-good comparison succeeds: isolate the production object or configuration associated with the failing operation.
- Same failure on the control: investigate the shared catalog, storage, filter-host, or query layer before changing source documents.
- Different status after one change: preserve both results; the first rejected condition was removed, but the operation is not yet proved complete.
A defensible fix
Correction: Fix unintended cancellation/timeout logic or treat expected abort as nonfatal while ensuring partial state is discarded safely. Keep the original catalog configuration, source inventory, filter identity, query definition, and event sequence so the change can be reversed and explained.
Accept the repair only when normal filtering completes when not cancelled and controlled cancellation leaves no stale searchable data or leaked filter process. Repeat the original supported operation under the original identity and object state; a new catalog, different source scope, or replacement filter is useful comparison evidence but not final regression proof.
Technical references
These sources describe the API, service architecture, and status values relevant to this diagnosis: Check version-specific behavior against the Windows and Indexing Service generation that produced the result.
- Microsoft: Indexing Service purpose and architecture — defines the formal status or component boundary.
- Microsoft: Indexing Service helper-function values — documents the relevant API or lifecycle.
- Microsoft: filtering file contents with IFilter — provides the architecture, format, or protocol context.
- Microsoft: filtering and caching file properties — supports the controlled verification criteria.
Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.