What does HRESULT 0xC004D31C (SL_REMAPPING_SP_PUB_TS_TAMPERED_DATA_VERSION_MISMATCH) mean?

 
Previous Next
SL_REMAPPING_SP_PUB_TS_TAMPERED_DATA_BREADCRUMB_MISMATCH SL_REMAPPING_SP_PUB_TAMPER_MODULE_AUTHENTICATION

SL_REMAPPING_SP_PUB_TS_TAMPERED_DATA_VERSION_MISMATCH

What the protected licensing code means

The useful meaning of SL_REMAPPING_SP_PUB_TS_TAMPERED_DATA_VERSION_MISMATCH, value 0xC004D31C, is not simply “activation failed.” It comes from the trusted store and secure-timer layer, where the protected state store that keeps namespaced entries, attributes, secure timers, trusted time, hardware binding, rearm state and integrity breadcrumbs. The condition to investigate is trusted-store protected data uses a version incompatible with the integrity metadata or current processor.

the first result diagnostic fork is precise: this is version compatibility, not merely different generation numbers. That is why this result can require a different correction from the same visible activation banner.

Testing the failing stage

  1. Use read-only inspection first: capture data version, breadcrumb/version fields, OS build and upgrade/rollback sequence.

What to capture before recovery

  • entry/timer flags including read-only state
  • requested and actual data size
  • trusted time, timer deadline and hardware-binding state
  • tamper/recreation/rearm events in chronological order
  • namespace, entry key and attribute name

Where it sits in the licensing pipeline

Trusted-store results concern protected persistent state; deleting the store can erase the evidence that distinguishes missing data, capacity, access, binding and integrity failures. To verify this, capture data version, breadcrumb/version fields, OS build and upgrade/rollback sequence.

A positive trusted-time or rearm/recreation result must be interpreted by HRESULT severity and the subsequent license state, not by treating every nonzero value as a fatal error.

Comparison with neighboring results

ResultDifferent condition
SL_REMAPPING_SP_PUB_TS_TAMPERED_DATA_BREADCRUMB_MISMATCHCompared with this result, trusted-store data and the associated integrity breadcrumb do not authenticate the same state.
SL_REMAPPING_SP_PUB_TS_TAMPERED_NO_DATACompared with this result, required protected trusted-store data is absent when integrity validation expects it.
SL_REMAPPING_SP_PUB_TS_TAMPERED_INVALID_DATACompared with it, trusted-store data fails internal semantic or integrity validation.

Targeted fix

Restore components and protected state from the same supported platform version or rebuild through documented recovery.

Representative case: An OS rollback leaves protected data written by a newer security-processor version.

Actions that usually destroy useful evidence

  • Do not use rearm as a generic repair for unrelated activation or integrity errors.
  • Do not manually delete protected store files before collecting state and event evidence.

Version skew usually points to servicing or rollback

Here the decisive comparison is between the protected-data schema, integrity metadata version, running security-processor build and current OS servicing level. A matching generation is not enough when one component interprets the bytes using a different version contract.

Review pending reboot state, failed cumulative updates, offline servicing, in-place upgrade history and VM rollback. Restore all licensing components from the same supported build using Windows servicing; do not copy a newer store into an older installation or downgrade individual policy and service binaries.

PatternLikely boundary
New data, old serviceAn update wrote protected state but the running component did not complete replacement/reboot.
Old data, new serviceRollback or partial restore retained a store from an earlier schema.
Mixed policy filesComponent-store repair is required before licensing-state recovery.

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.