What does HRESULT 0xC004F060 (SL_E_INVALID_PACKAGE_VERSION) mean?

 
Previous Next
SL_E_SLP_BAD_FORMAT SL_E_PKEY_INVALID_UPGRADE

SL_E_INVALID_PACKAGE_VERSION

How to interpret this HRESULT

When SL_E_INVALID_PACKAGE_VERSION returns 0xC004F060, diagnosis has reached the local Software Protection Platform. The decisive condition is: the package version is not accepted by this Software Protection Platform build.

AllStat records “The Software Licensing Service determined that the version of the license package is invalid” for this HRESULT. That identifies the official outcome; the additional value is the producing object, evidence set, nearby conditions and safe verification path.

Relevant processing model

StageRole for this HRESULT
Product instanceApplication ID and Activation ID identify the exact licensed object.
License inputsPackages, dependencies, signatures and policies feeding this result are loaded for that object.
Requested transitionThe right, property, event, plug-in or service operation that returns this result is evaluated.
Commit or statusThe intended state cannot be trusted or committed while this result remains unresolved.

A later unlicensed, notification or grace-state message describes a consequence. Preserve the earliest event carrying this HRESULT for the same product object or service request.

What the constant itself tells you

SignalInterpretation
FamilyThe result is local to Software Protection Platform and should be tied to one product object, not the computer in general.
ObjectValidation rejected the named object; it was present but not acceptable.
OperationThe containing license package, manifest or version is the primary subject.
StateThe suffix names the object or transition to inspect before any broad activation reset.

What to collect first

EvidenceQuestion answered
Application ID, Activation ID and product nameFor this HRESULT: Which Application ID and Activation ID returned the code?
LicenseStatus, LicenseStatusReason and grace valuesFor this HRESULT: Was the failure during package load, policy evaluation, authorization or service maintenance?
first API/slmgr method and earliest Security-SPP eventFor this HRESULT: Is the named object absent, invalid, mismatched, duplicated or in the wrong lifecycle state?
license/package identity, version, digest and dependencyFor this HRESULT: Can caller identity and elevation be captured before changing state?
caller identity and elevationFor this HRESULT: Does the evidence support “align package, product and Windows servicing levels using supported media” rather than a current-version package with malformed contents?

Checks in a useful order

  1. After one supported change, repeat the same operation and compare state, events and response correlation for this HRESULT.
  2. Bind this result to the exact Application ID, Activation ID, edition and partial key.
  3. Record 0xC004F060, UTC time, caller and the first method or server request that returned it.
  4. Capture Application ID, Activation ID and product name specifically for this HRESULT.
  5. Prove the distinction between the named boundary and a current-version package with malformed contents before remediation.
REM Evidence context: SL_E_INVALID_PACKAGE_VERSION
cscript %windir%\system32\slmgr.vbs /dlv
powershell -NoProfile -Command "Get-CimInstance SoftwareLicensingProduct | Where-Object PartialProductKey | Select Name,ApplicationID,ID,LicenseStatus,LicenseStatusReason,PartialProductKey"

Keep neighboring codes separate

ResultDifferent condition
SL_E_ISSUANCE_LICENSE_NOT_INSTALLEDa required issuance license is not installed for the requested entitlement workflow
SL_E_DEPENDENT_PROPERTY_NOT_SETa property is being written before the license property it depends on has been established
SL_E_OPERATION_NOT_ALLOWEDthe operation is recognized but forbidden by current license, policy or object state

A focused reproduction for this exact result

ControlDesign
Failing fixtureA license package from a newer OS is installed on a down-level system.
Single variableChange only license package source, structure and version.
Positive controlThe matching official package loads without changing the product object.
Different resultIf the experiment instead proves “a required issuance license is not installed for the requested entitlement workflow”, follow that neighboring boundary rather than treating it as it.

This controlled comparison is stronger than a broad reset because it changes one prerequisite and leaves product identity, evidence source and observation method stable.

Safe recovery direction

A supported correction is to align package, product and Windows servicing levels using supported media. A representative incident is a license package from a newer OS is installed on a down-level system.

Changes that make this code harder to diagnose

  • avoid using rearm or key replacement as a universal package/policy repair; it changes evidence without proving the named boundary.
  • avoid copying license packages or protected stores from another computer; it changes evidence without proving the named boundary.
  • avoid force-deleting policy, plug-in or license files while sppsvc owns them; it changes evidence without proving the named boundary.

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.