What does HRESULT 0xC00D0FCF (NS_E_SHARING_VIOLATION) mean?

 
Previous Next
NS_E_MEDIA_LIBRARY_FAILED NS_E_NO_ERROR_STRING_FOUND

NS_E_SHARING_VIOLATION

What this HRESULT means

0xC00D0FCF maps to NS_E_SHARING_VIOLATION. Its actionable interpretation is another handle’s sharing mode prevents the required WMP file access, within WMP file download, save and package persistence; the producing mechanism is the boundary where the Player resolves a path or URL, opens a source or destination, downloads or serializes content and commits the resulting playlist, skin or media-related file.

The additional test for the sharing violation condition is to identify the file, requested access/share flags and owning process/handle; that evidence is more useful than reinstalling the Player or changing several unrelated settings at once.

Evidence to capture before retry

Preserve the first occurrence before retry or fallback changes the sharing conflict evidence. The following fields should identify the same object instance:

FieldWhat to record
What to verifyidentify the file, requested access/share flags and owning process/handle
Artifact identitydestination directory, temporary file and final rename/replace result for the access conflict reproduction
Runtime statefile attributes, owner, ACL and sharing handles for the sharing state reproduction
Owning objectbytes received/written, expected length and final hash for the sharing conflict reproduction
Lower-level resultoriginal URL/path and final redirected or canonical location for the access conflict reproduction
CorrelationHTTP status/content type or local CreateFile-style access outcome for the sharing state reproduction

A focused diagnostic sequence

  1. Preserve 0xC00D0FCF, the ErrorItem context and the object instance involved in sharing conflict.
  2. Compare the failing access conflict artifact with a known-good artifact that differs only in the suspected property.
  3. Separate acquisition, parsing, object construction, playback and persistence until the owner of sharing state is clear.
  4. After you close or coordinate the conflicting owner and repeat the same operation for access conflict, recreate the owning WMP object and verify that the corrected generation completes.

Correct the producing condition

  • Avoid retrying save under a new name without recording the failing destination and access mode while investigating sharing state; it can destroy the artifact or state needed to explain this result.
  • Avoid treating a downloaded error page as a valid playlist, skin or media package; for sharing conflict, that can replace the original HRESULT with a secondary failure from another layer.

Why the symbolic name matters

ResultDifferent condition
NS_E_FILE_FAILED_CHECKSthe file fails the Player library admission checks before it can be added
NS_E_DAMAGED_FILEthe media parser identifies structural corruption in a file selected for use
NS_E_WMP_RECORDING_NOT_ALLOWEDthe selected content rights do not permit the requested recording or burn action

If this result is followed by a broader “cannot play,” “cannot load,” or “operation failed” result, preserve the earlier access conflict event. In the case, the later code can be a consequence from a wrapper, fallback item or UI layer rather than the producing failure.

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.