| Previous | Next |
| NS_E_INVALID_OPERATING_SYSTEM_VERSION | NS_E_INVALID_PUSH_PUBLISHING_POINT_START_REQUEST |
NS_E_PUBLISHING_POINT_REMOVED
Server-side meaning of NS_E_PUBLISHING_POINT_REMOVED
Mechanism and scope
This result (0xC00D145A) marks the caller still holds an object for a publishing point that has been deleted from the server collection. It belongs to the server-side control path, not to a generic local media-player failure.
Publishing points are stateful server objects with a type, path, name, plug-in collections and start/stop lifecycle., broadcast, on-demand, cache/proxy and push points do not expose identical methods or valid transitions. In a this result trace, read the point type and status from the live server object model. While diagnosing it, a name in an old MMC view or retained COM interface can describe an earlier generation. The decisive question is whether the live object and values match that boundary; the base AllStat description alone does not reveal the object generation, selected plug-in or lower-level failure.
Test the owning precondition
- Capture
0xC00D145A, this result, the exact API/administrative action and the first failure timestamp. - Preserve moniker/name, object acquisition time, removal event, server generation and current publishing-point enumeration.
- confirm that the object still belongs to the current WMServer, publishing-point or presentation generation.
- Perform one isolated experiment: discard the stale COM object and resolve the point again by name only if it still exists.
- Repeat the original the operation through the same protocol and service account; do not substitute a different client-side test.
- After this result, verify the expected next state and retain any later HRESULT as a separate pipeline result.
Success means the same operation crosses this checkpoint and produces the expected next state, not merely that the symbolic code disappears.
Code-specific failure anatomy
In a representative incident, the server reaches the caller still holds an object for a publishing point that has been deleted from the server collection and rejects the operation before the caller can safely assume the next stage occurred. The incident record should therefore join moniker/name, object acquisition time, removal event, server generation and current publishing-point enumeration with the object generation and the exact administrative or protocol request.
A useful negative control is discard the stale COM object and resolve the point again by name only if it still exists. If that change advances the same it call, the result supports this boundary. If it remains, return to the first lower-level event instead of broadening the repair.
The tempting but misleading response is calling methods repeatedly on the old interface pointer. That action does not test the distinction that matters here: stopped means the object still exists; removed means its identity is no longer part of the server. This distinction is also why monitoring should retain the symbolic name instead of storing only a generic COM failure.
Build a reproducible incident record
| Evidence | Why it matters for this HRESULT |
|---|---|
| Decisive state | moniker/name, object acquisition time, removal event, server generation and current publishing-point enumeration. |
| Owning object | Record the server, publishing point, playlist, namespace node, plug-in or cache item that returned it, including its creation or restart time. |
| First lower-level result | Preserve the earliest Win32, socket, COM, parser or plug-in event before the HRESULT; later wrappers can map several causes to it. |
| Controlled comparison | Use a known-good object of the same type and vary only the precondition described as “the caller still holds an object for a publishing point that has been deleted from the server collection”. |
| Security-sensitive data | Log identifiers, lengths, hashes and redacted URLs where possible; do not publish passwords, authorization files or unrestricted client data. |
Verification outcomes
| Retest observation | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| The same call still returns it | The rejected precondition has not changed, or the caller is still using an old object/configuration generation. |
| The operation advances and a later code appears | The boundary was cleared. After it, diagnose the new code at its own source, parser, sink, network or client stage. |
| A new object succeeds while the retained object fails | Object lifetime or stale context is part of the incident; update lifecycle handling rather than applying a machine-wide repair. |
| Only one publishing point, playlist, cache key or plug-in fails | The evidence favors object-specific configuration or content over a server-wide outage. |
Changes that do not establish the cause
- calling methods repeatedly on the old interface pointer.
- a broad reinstall is especially weak evidence here because it changes many unrelated components while leaving the rejected server precondition unexplained.
- Do not suppress it or replace it with a generic “media server error”; retain the symbolic code and owning operation in telemetry.
Related codes are different
Primary distinction: stopped means the object still exists; removed means its identity is no longer part of the server.
| Nearby result | Different checkpoint |
|---|---|
NS_E_INVALID_PUSH_PUBLISHING_POINT_START_REQUEST | Compare its own symbolic boundary and the first failing call; it must not be grouped automatically with it. |
NS_E_INVALID_OPERATING_SYSTEM_VERSION | Relative to it, this neighboring result belongs to another state or validation branch even when the user-visible symptom is similar. |
NS_E_UNSUPPORTED_LANGUAGE | Use the object type and operation sequence to determine which result is authoritative. |
Technical references
- Expanded Use of Publishing Points
- Expanded Use of Plug-ins
- WMS Multicast Data Writer Plug-in Properties
- Microsoft HRESULT registry
Close the incident only after it clears on a current object.
Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.