Site icon EfmSoft

What does HRESULT 0x80096002 (TRUST_E_NO_SIGNER_CERT) mean?

 
Previous Next
TRUST_E_SYSTEM_ERROR TRUST_E_COUNTER_SIGNER

TRUST_E_NO_SIGNER_CERT

The important part of TRUST_E_NO_SIGNER_CERT is its scope: CMS/Authenticode signer identification. The signed object names a signer, but Windows cannot locate or accept the certificate needed to validate that signer information. Keep the hexadecimal value 0x80096002 with the returning API, because higher-level software may translate it into a message that loses this distinction.

Read the failure at the correct layer

CMS or Authenticode signer information identifies a certificate through issuer/serial or subject-key identifier and may also rely on embedded or external certificate collections. Preserve the signed data, signer identifier, included certificates, stores, and selection result.

Build an incident record

  1. 1. Signer identifier and every certificate embedded in or supplied to the message
    Inspect SignerIdentifier in the CMS message and the embedded certificate set.
  2. 2. Certificate stores and retrieval mechanisms consulted by the trust path
    Check issuer/serial or subject-key-identifier matching and whether the certificate was omitted.
  3. 3. Chain result, key usage, time validity, and signature algorithm for the candidate signer
    Verify that the candidate signer certificate has the expected public key and signature usage.

For CMS/Authenticode signer identification, these observations are deliberately nonsecret: identifiers, lengths, provider names, policy selections, and state transitions usually support comparison without recording private keys, passwords, PINs, or plaintext.

Correlate the failure with state changes

In the path, trust verification is a pipeline, not one Boolean check. Align artifact acquisition, signature decoding, signer selection, countersignature or timestamp processing, chain construction, revocation retrieval, and final action policy. Preserve provider state before closing it so the generic top-level result can be connected to the stage that actually rejected the subject.

Use two comparison axes

Inspect the signer information independently and locate the exact certificate by its identifier., then verify that certificate and signature separately before running the full trust action.

TestInterpretation
Same input, known-good pathFor CMS/Authenticode signer identification, success moves attention toward the selected provider, policy, device, context, or transaction state.
Known-good input, failing pathFor CMS/Authenticode signer identification, failure suggests that the environment or selected object is independently unable to perform the operation.
Original path after one isolated changeFor CMS/Authenticode signer identification, this comparison demonstrates whether the proposed correction addresses the original condition.

Do not collapse it into a neighboring code

A missing signer certificate is different from an untrusted chain: chain policy starts only after the signer certificate is identified. Adding an unrelated certificate with the same subject name can create ambiguous selection and does not satisfy issuer/serial or key-identifier matching.

For CMS/Authenticode signer identification, also retain the original numeric value; neighboring constants can encode materially different remediation paths even when an application presents all of them as an authentication, certificate, or security failure.

Verification after the change

Windows must select the intended signer certificate, validate the signature, and build the required policy chain for the original signed object. Keep a regression case that uses nonsecret identifiers and expected outcomes, including one negative control that must continue to fail.

Technical references

These sources define the HRESULT and the relevant CMS/Authenticode signer identification interface, protocol, or data format.


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.

Exit mobile version