Site icon EfmSoft

What does HRESULT 0x80EE0008 (RTC_E_SDP_UPDATE_FAILED) mean?

 
Previous Next
RTC_E_SDP_PARSE_FAILED RTC_E_SDP_MULTICAST

RTC_E_SDP_UPDATE_FAILED

Where the state changes: RTC_E_SDP_UPDATE_FAILED

The operational meaning of this result is tied to parsing, constructing, or reconciling SIP signaling and the SDP offer/answer carried by it: a new SDP description is incompatible with the prior negotiated offer/answer state.

Log this result as 0x80EE0008 in the RTC interface facility 0xEE, not only as a signed decimal; the facility distinguishes local RTC validation from a response status mapped by the stack.

Before changing configuration, compare o= session version, media-line order, direction, addresses, codecs, and the pending offer owner; the RTC codes surrounding this result are not equivalent because a standalone-valid SDP can still be an invalid update to an established session.

Protocol and object state

RTC areaSIP message and SDP negotiation
Condition to provea new SDP description is incompatible with the prior negotiated offer/answer state
Objects to correlateSIP start-line and headers, message body framing, SDP session and media sections, offer/answer generation
Safe corrective directionserialize offer/answer changes and build the update from the current negotiated description

Interpreting this result requires both of these facts: SIP transaction state and media negotiation are separate: a syntactically valid SIP request can still contain absent or unacceptable SDP; also, the result branch assumes that An SDP update must be checked against the previous offer/answer state, not merely parsed as a standalone text document.

Comparison with adjacent codes

RTC_E_SIP_STREAM_NOT_PRESENTcode attempted to stop or remove a stream that is not active in the current session generation
RTC_E_SIP_HEADER_NOT_PRESENTan RTC operation requires a SIP header that is absent from the parsed message
RTC_E_SDP_PARSE_FAILEDthe message body is labeled or treated as SDP but violates the SDP grammar or field requirements

Telemetry and packet evidence

  • Code-specific proof: compare o= session version, media-line order, direction, addresses, codecs, and the pending offer owner.
  • Addressing context: start-line plus header names.
  • RTC callback state: Content-Type and Content-Length.
  • Transaction boundary: SDP o= version and c= address.
  • Media or profile detail: each m= line and codec mapping.

Step-by-step isolation

  1. Start from 0x80EE0008, then find the method/event pair that first exposed it.
  2. Keep the analysis at the right boundary: a standalone-valid SDP can still be an invalid update to an established session.
  3. After you serialize offer/answer changes and build the update from the current negotiated description, repeat the smallest reproducer rather than restarting the entire application environment.

Actions that do not address this condition

  • Do not log credentials or an unredacted SDP body from production calls.
  • Do not repair malformed signaling by silently deleting unknown headers or media sections.

Recovery

Resolve it at its producing layer: serialize offer/answer changes and build the update from the current negotiated description; after it, a separate UI or watchdog retry must wait until that layer reports a final state.

Example: Two components issue overlapping re-INVITE changes and the later answer corresponds to the wrong offer.

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.

Exit mobile version