What does HRESULT 0x80EE002F (RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_PROVISION) mean?

Status / error code:		Category:

Constant name:
Source:	Operating System:
Description: No provision tag in profile

Previous	Next
RTC_E_INVALID_PROFILE	RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_KEY

RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_PROVISION

Where the state changes: `RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_PROVISION`

Diagnosis begins inside creating or enabling an XML profile that defines user identity, servers, transports, authentication, and supported session types, where the decisive condition for this HRESULT is the provisioning profile omits the required provision field.

The numeric form of this result is 0x80EE002F in the RTC interface facility 0xEE; an exception translator handling it should preserve this value before converting it into application-facing call or presence states.

Evidence for this HRESULT should show that you parse the profile with schema-aware diagnostics and identify the owning provision, user, server, or session element; the diagnostic distinction for this HRESULT is that a missing field differs from a present field whose value or cross-field combination is invalid.

Telemetry and packet evidence

Do not wait for a generic failure notification to log this result; preserve the API call or event producing it together with the RTC object and transaction state visible at that moment.

Code-specific proof for this HRESULT: parse the profile with schema-aware diagnostics and identify the owning provision, user, server, or session element.
Addressing context for this HRESULT: server role/address/transport.
RTC callback state for this HRESULT: authentication method.
Transaction boundary for this HRESULT: session type and party attributes.
Media or profile detail for this HRESULT: redacted profile XML path/version.

When recording this result, redact credentials, full telephone numbers, private contact lists, and message bodies; for this HRESULT, retain permitted URI domains, header names, byte counts, hashes, transaction identifiers, timestamps, and state transitions.

Protocol and object boundary

RTC area	RTC provisioning profile validation boundary
Condition to prove	the provisioning profile omits the required provision field
Objects to correlate	profile `XML`, provision/user/server/session elements, registrar and proxy roles, transport and authentication method
Safe corrective direction	supply the authoritative provision value and regenerate the profile rather than inserting a guessed placeholder

The surrounding protocol rule for this HRESULT is that CreateProfile validates the provisioning schema and cross-field constraints; a field can be present yet still be unusable with the chosen transport or role; in addition, the path requires that The enabled profile selected for a call must support both the destination and the requested session type.

Actions that do not address this condition

The following shortcut is unsafe for this HRESULT: do not log passwords or provisioning secrets from profile XML.
Another non-solution for this HRESULT is to do not insert placeholder values solely to pass schema validation.
Do not translate this result into a broad “connection failed” label before preserving the RTC symbol and producing phase.

Step-by-step isolation

Start from 0x80EE002F and it, then find the method/event pair that first exposed it.
check whether the failure was local before transmission, produced during RTC state validation, or mapped from a remote response.
the proof step is to parse the profile with schema-aware diagnostics and identify the owning provision, user, server, or session element.
keep the analysis at the right boundary: a missing field differs from a present field whose value or cross-field combination is invalid.
after you supply the authoritative provision value and regenerate the profile rather than inserting a guessed placeholder, repeat the smallest reproducer rather than restarting the entire application environment.

The result diagnosis is strongest when object state and protocol trace share timestamps and transaction identifiers; when diagnosing it, avoid treating packet capture and HRESULT logging as substitutes for one another.

Remediation boundary

The corrective direction for this HRESULT is to supply the authoritative provision value and regenerate the profile rather than inserting a guessed placeholder; for this HRESULT, cancellation, cleanup, and retry should remain with the component that owns the failed transition.

Before retrying it, classify the previous operation as definitely failed, definitely completed, or remotely uncertain; for this HRESULT, that distinction prevents duplicate dialogs, bindings, transfers, or roaming mutations.

Example for this HRESULT: A provisioning template creates a profile without provision and RTC rejects it before the profile can be enabled.

Comparison with adjacent codes

Use the following contrast when classifying it: it is tied to the condition “the provisioning profile omits the required provision field”; preserve that producing boundary before choosing recovery; for this HRESULT, similar subsystem names do not imply identical recovery.

`RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_KEY`	the provisioning profile omits the required key field
`RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_SERVER_PROTOCOL`	the provisioning profile omits the required server protocol field
`RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_USER`	the provisioning profile omits the required user field

The comparison prevents it from being flattened into a subsystem-wide error bucket with unsafe generic remediation.

Verification after a fix

A regression test for this HRESULT should reproduce “the provisioning profile omits the required provision field” with the smallest profile, message, session, presence, media, or PINT fixture; for this HRESULT, assert 0x80EE002F, the responsible method/event, and the object state after the result; then, for this HRESULT, change only the decisive precondition and verify that the corrected run leaves no stale transaction or RTC object.

Technical references

IRTCClientProvisioning::CreateProfile — definitions relevant when reproducing it.
IRTCProfile server fields — API or protocol rules used to interpret it.
Microsoft RTC return constants — authoritative context for the boundary.
SIP and TEL URLs — definitions relevant when reproducing it.

Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.