Site icon EfmSoft

What does HRESULT 0x80EF01E4 (RTC_E_STATUS_CLIENT_ADDRESS_INCOMPLETE) mean?

 
Previous Next
RTC_E_STATUS_CLIENT_TOO_MANY_HOPS RTC_E_STATUS_CLIENT_AMBIGUOUS

RTC_E_STATUS_CLIENT_ADDRESS_INCOMPLETE

Where the state changes: RTC_E_STATUS_CLIENT_ADDRESS_INCOMPLETE

This HRESULT is emitted for a defined RTC state rather than an unspecified communications problem; that state is the Request-URI lacks information required to identify or route the destination.

At the HRESULT layer, this result appears as 0x80EF01E4 in the RTC SIP-status facility carrying status 484; preserving the facility and symbol prevents it from being grouped incorrectly with unrelated networking or media errors.

To establish this result, capture the normalized URI, user/host parts, telephone context, and where address completion was expected; this matters because Address Incomplete is different from 404: the address cannot yet be resolved as a complete target.

Protocol and object state

RTC areaSIP final response
Condition to provethe Request-URI lacks information required to identify or route the destination
Objects to correlateSIP request method, client transaction, response status, dialog identifiers and method-specific headers
Safe corrective directionobtain the missing domain, area/context, or user component and rebuild the destination

Comparison with adjacent codes

This result should not be grouped with every value from the same facility. 404 applies to a complete URI that the domain cannot resolve; the result table shows nearby alternatives.

RTC_E_STATUS_CLIENT_NOT_FOUNDthe responding domain has no current user or resource matching the Request-URI
RTC_E_STATUS_CLIENT_TRANSACTION_DOES_NOT_EXISTthe recipient cannot match the request to an existing dialog or server/client transaction
RTC_E_STATUS_SERVER_BAD_GATEWAYthe responding gateway or proxy received an invalid response from an upstream server

Telemetry and packet evidence

The evidence set should begin at the first failing or completing RTC operation; reconnect and teardown events are secondary unless they caused the original result.

  • Code-specific proof: capture the normalized URI, user/host parts, telephone context, and where address completion was expected.
  • Addressing context: responding Via hop.
  • RTC callback state: Call-ID/CSeq/tags.
  • Transaction boundary: status-specific headers.
  • Media or profile detail: retry or alternate-target decision.

Step-by-step isolation

  1. Use protocol and object evidence to capture the normalized URI, user/host parts, telephone context, and where address completion was expected.
  2. Confirm the distinction that Address Incomplete is different from 404: the address cannot yet be resolved as a complete target.
  3. Start a fresh operation after you obtain the missing domain, area/context, or user component and rebuild the destination, and compare its final state with the failing run.

Actions that do not address this condition

  • Do not retry every 4xx or 5xx response with the identical request.
  • Do not show a reason phrase as trusted server identity or authorization evidence.

Recovery

Resolve it at its producing layer: obtain the missing domain, area/context, or user component and rebuild the destination; after it, a separate UI or watchdog retry must wait until that layer reports a final state.

Example: A phone-style URI is submitted without the domain or dialing context needed by the gateway.

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.

Exit mobile version