Site icon EfmSoft

What does HRESULT 0xC0041807 (CI_CORRUPT_FILTER_BUFFER) mean?

 
Previous Next
CI_NO_CATALOG CI_INVALID_INDEX

CI_CORRUPT_FILTER_BUFFER

CI_CORRUPT_FILTER_BUFFER0xC0041807

Treat this code as a record of corrupt Indexing Service filter buffer: in the operation that returned it, the interprocess buffer carrying IFilter output or document data was found inconsistent.

Place in the component lifecycle

CiDaemon hosts IFilter components that emit text chunks and value-type properties. In the context of corrupt Indexing Service filter buffer, filter CLSID/version, source hash, chunk/property identity, buffer size, cancellation, and a clean-catalog comparison separate a bad document from a faulty filter or catalog. Locate the first component changing state in this condition and distinguish later summary errors.

Important boundary. A corrupt filter buffer can be produced by a faulty filter even when the catalog and source file are otherwise valid. Record the exact constant and returning API.

Build a reliable incident timeline

PreserveWhy it matters
Source document/hash, filter CLSID/version, chunk number, buffer size, and CiDaemon eventSeparates catalog state from source data, filter output, and client lifecycle.
Custom or third-party IFilter involvementProvides a stable before/after comparison for rebuilding or correcting the index path.
Process crash, timeout, or memory diagnosticsShows whether the first inconsistency arose during filtering, storage, administration, or enumeration.
Same document filtered by the built-in or known-good filter in a clean catalogTies the result to one catalog, source document, filter, or query object.

Preserve the smallest reproducible evidence set and remove document content or access-control details before sharing diagnostics.

Tests that change one variable

Retry only after one controlled catalog, filter, source, query, or merge condition changed; reopening the service may create a new catalog generation and hide the original evidence.

Interpretation boundaries

When a minimal control succeeds, the failure is tied to the original object or its state rather than to the whole Windows subsystem. When the control fails identically, preserve host-level evidence first. If a different code appears, that is a moved boundary, not automatic success.

Preserve whether the result came from filtering, catalog storage, administration, or query enumeration; those paths can share a catalog name while requiring different corrective actions.

Repair and regression proof

Correction: Fix or isolate the filter implementation, validate chunk sizes and ownership, then rescan affected documents. Keep the original catalog configuration, source inventory, filter identity, query definition, and event sequence so the change can be reversed and explained.

Accept the repair only when the document filters repeatedly without buffer corruption and the catalog remains stable under mixed-file ingestion. Repeat the original supported operation under the original identity and object state; a new catalog, different source scope, or replacement filter is useful comparison evidence but not final regression proof.

Technical references

The following primary Microsoft documentation defines the status family and component boundaries used here: Check version-specific behavior against the Windows and Indexing Service generation that produced the result.


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.

Exit mobile version