Site icon EfmSoft

What does HRESULT 0xC00D13EC (NS_E_CACHE_ARCHIVE_CONFLICT) mean?

 
Previous Next
NS_E_NAMESPACE_WRONG_SECURITY NS_E_CACHE_ORIGIN_SERVER_NOT_FOUND

NS_E_CACHE_ARCHIVE_CONFLICT

How to investigate NS_E_CACHE_ARCHIVE_CONFLICT

Mechanism and scope

This result (0xC00D13EC) marks a cache download/archive operation overlaps another incompatible operation for the same content. It belongs to the server-side control path, not to a generic local media-player failure.

The cache/proxy layer first applies policy, then decides whether to serve local content, revalidate it, contact an origin server, proxy it, redirect the client or reject the request., those decisions are separate from ordinary player buffering. In a this result trace, keep the cache key, origin validators and policy decision together. While diagnosing it, a cache proxy behaves both as a server to the player and as a client to the origin. The decisive question is whether the live object and values match that boundary; the base AllStat description alone does not reveal the object generation, selected plug-in or lower-level failure.

What to record before changing anything

EvidenceWhy it matters for it
Decisive statecache key, origin URL, active archive/download handles, content version and operation start times.
Owning objectRecord the server, publishing point, playlist, namespace node, plug-in or cache item that returned this result, including its creation or restart time.
First lower-level resultPreserve the earliest Win32, socket, COM, parser or plug-in event before the HRESULT; later wrappers can map several causes to this result.
Controlled comparisonUse a known-good object of the same type and vary only the precondition described as “a cache download/archive operation overlaps another incompatible operation for the same content”.
Security-sensitive dataLog identifiers, lengths, hashes and redacted URLs where possible; do not publish passwords, authorization files or unrestricted client data.

Comparison with adjacent states

Primary distinction: origin timeout is an upstream communication failure; archive conflict is local operation concurrency.

Nearby resultDifferent checkpoint
NS_E_CACHE_ORIGIN_SERVER_NOT_FOUNDCompare its own symbolic boundary and the first failing call; it must not be grouped automatically with it.
NS_E_CACHE_NOT_MODIFIEDRelative to it, this neighboring result belongs to another state or validation branch even when the user-visible symptom is similar.
NS_E_CACHE_ORIGIN_SERVER_TIMEOUTUse the object type and operation sequence to determine which result is authoritative.

Code-specific failure anatomy

In a representative incident, the server reaches a cache download/archive operation overlaps another incompatible operation for the same content and rejects the operation before the caller can safely assume the next stage occurred. The incident record should therefore join cache key, origin URL, active archive/download handles, content version and operation start times with the object generation and the exact administrative or protocol request.

A useful negative control is serialize the operations for that cache item or wait for the current archive to finish before issuing the next request. If that change advances the same it call, the result supports this boundary. If it remains, return to the first lower-level event instead of broadening the repair.

The tempting but misleading response is deleting arbitrary cached files while handles remain active. That action does not test the distinction that matters here: origin timeout is an upstream communication failure; archive conflict is local operation concurrency. This distinction is also why monitoring should retain the symbolic name instead of storing only a generic COM failure.

Smallest useful experiment

  1. Capture 0xC00D13EC, it, the exact API/administrative action and the first failure timestamp.
  2. Preserve cache key, origin URL, active archive/download handles, content version and operation start times.
  3. confirm that the object still belongs to the current WMServer, publishing-point or presentation generation.
  4. Perform one isolated experiment: serialize the operations for that cache item or wait for the current archive to finish before issuing the next request.
  5. Repeat the original the operation through the same protocol and service account; do not substitute a different client-side test.
  6. After it, verify the expected next state and retain any later HRESULT as a separate pipeline result.

Success means the same operation crosses this checkpoint and produces the expected next state, not merely that the symbolic code disappears.

Changes that do not establish the cause

Verification outcomes

Retest observationInterpretation
The same call still returns itThe rejected precondition has not changed, or the caller is still using an old object/configuration generation.
The operation advances and a later code appearsThe boundary was cleared. After it, diagnose the new code at its own source, parser, sink, network or client stage.
A new object succeeds while the retained object failsObject lifetime or stale context is part of the incident; update lifecycle handling rather than applying a machine-wide repair.
Only one publishing point, playlist, cache key or plug-in failsThe evidence favors object-specific configuration or content over a server-wide outage.

Technical references

Close the incident only after it clears on a current object.


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.

Exit mobile version