Site icon EfmSoft

What does HRESULT 0xC00D151B (NS_E_INVALID_PUSH_PUBLISHING_POINT) mean?

 
Previous Next
NS_E_INVALID_PUSH_TEMPLATE NS_E_CRITICAL_ERROR

NS_E_INVALID_PUSH_PUBLISHING_POINT

NS_E_INVALID_PUSH_PUBLISHING_POINT: owning object, evidence and recovery

Mechanism and scope

This result (0xC00D151B) marks the push target is absent, wrong type or otherwise unsuitable for encoder push. It belongs to the server-side control path, not to a generic local media-player failure.

A server distribution path connects a data source, parser, media header and one or more data sinks., push publication adds an encoder-to-server control path, while client delivery uses a separate protocol and connection state. In a this result trace, trace input and output independently: source selection, parsing/header creation and sink selection are separate checkpoints. The decisive question is whether the live object and values match that boundary; the base AllStat description alone does not reveal the object generation, selected plug-in or lower-level failure.

Reading the second result

Retest observationInterpretation
The same call still returns this resultThe rejected precondition has not changed, or the caller is still using an old object/configuration generation.
The operation advances and a later code appearsThe boundary was cleared. After this result, diagnose the new code at its own source, parser, sink, network or client stage.
A new object succeeds while the retained object failsObject lifetime or stale context is part of the incident; update lifecycle handling rather than applying a machine-wide repair.
Only one publishing point, playlist, cache key or plug-in failsThe evidence favors object-specific configuration or content over a server-wide outage.

Code-specific failure anatomy

In a representative incident, the server reaches the push target is absent, wrong type or otherwise unsuitable for encoder push and rejects the operation before the caller can safely assume the next stage occurred. The incident record should therefore join server name, publishing-point name, point type, push data source configuration, ACL and current owner connection with the object generation and the exact administrative or protocol request.

A useful negative control is verify the target through the server object model and create/configure a true push broadcast point before reconnecting the encoder. If that change advances the same it call, the result supports this boundary. If it remains, return to the first lower-level event instead of broadening the repair.

The tempting but misleading response is testing only the public playback URL; encoder push uses a different direction and authorization path. That action does not test the distinction that matters here: duplicate push name is creation-time collision; invalid push point rejects the selected target. This distinction is also why monitoring should retain the symbolic name instead of storing only a generic COM failure.

What to record before changing anything

EvidenceWhy it matters for it
Decisive stateserver name, publishing-point name, point type, push data source configuration, ACL and current owner connection.
Owning objectRecord the server, publishing point, playlist, namespace node, plug-in or cache item that returned it, including its creation or restart time.
First lower-level resultPreserve the earliest Win32, socket, COM, parser or plug-in event before the HRESULT; later wrappers can map several causes to it.
Controlled comparisonUse a known-good object of the same type and vary only the precondition described as “the push target is absent, wrong type or otherwise unsuitable for encoder push”.
Security-sensitive dataLog identifiers, lengths, hashes and redacted URLs where possible; do not publish passwords, authorization files or unrestricted client data.

A controlled correction

  1. Capture 0xC00D151B, it, the exact API/administrative action and the first failure timestamp.
  2. Preserve server name, publishing-point name, point type, push data source configuration, ACL and current owner connection.
  3. confirm that the object still belongs to the current WMServer, publishing-point or presentation generation.
  4. Perform one isolated experiment: verify the target through the server object model and create/configure a true push broadcast point before reconnecting the encoder.
  5. Repeat the original the operation through the same protocol and service account; do not substitute a different client-side test.
  6. After it, verify the expected next state and retain any later HRESULT as a separate pipeline result.

For automated tests, assert both the HRESULT and the resulting publishing-point, playlist, plug-in or archive state.

Comparison with adjacent states

Primary distinction: duplicate push name is creation-time collision; invalid push point rejects the selected target.

Nearby resultDifferent checkpoint
NS_E_CRITICAL_ERRORCompare its own symbolic boundary and the first failing call; it must not be grouped automatically with it.
NS_E_INVALID_PUSH_TEMPLATERelative to it, this neighboring result belongs to another state or validation branch even when the user-visible symptom is similar.
NS_E_NO_NEW_CONNECTIONSUse the object type and operation sequence to determine which result is authoritative.

Changes that do not establish the cause

Technical references

Close the incident only after it clears on a current object.


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.

Exit mobile version