Site icon EfmSoft

What does HRESULT 0xC00D2753 (NS_E_DRM_RESTORE_FRAUD) mean?

 
Previous Next
NS_E_DRM_APPCERT_REVOKED NS_E_DRM_HARDWARE_INCONSISTENT

NS_E_DRM_RESTORE_FRAUD

The exact DRM condition

NS_E_DRM_RESTORE_FRAUD is Windows Media DRM HRESULT 0xC00D2753. It identifies the restoration request is rejected by anti-abuse or restore-limit logic. The useful scope is the backup/restore workflow that enumerates eligible licenses, writes a backup set, sends restoration requests to the license-management service and reconciles restored state with the target machine; it is not a generic statement that the media player, network or file system failed.

The surrounding protocol and store state

Only licenses carrying the backup/restore right are eligible, and licenses with secure state can be intentionally excluded by the issuer. Backup and restore are multi-stage asynchronous operations; one damaged member or a stale request identifier is not equivalent to an unavailable service.

Evidence worth preserving

  • Code-specific proof: record service response, restore history and target identity without attempting to bypass the limit.
  • Protected identity: target machine identity and final license-store commit.
  • Operation state: backup or restore operation ID.
  • Persistence or transport: backup directory contents and manifest consistency.
  • Security context: per-license backup/restore eligibility.
  • Correlation point: service response, reset count and daily restore limit.

For the “restore fraud” investigation, use KIDs, license IDs, hashes, certificate thumbprints, sizes and timestamps where possible. Do not place content keys, complete license blobs, passwords, cookies or decrypted media in ordinary logs.

Related codes and the diagnostic split

ResultDifferent condition
NS_E_DRM_INVALID_SECURESTORE_PASSWORDSecure-store password validation failed.
NS_E_BACKUP_RESTORE_BAD_DATABackup/restore data fails format or integrity validation.
NS_E_DRM_BACKUPRESTORE_BUSYA backup or restore operation is already active.

Several values can accompany the “restore fraud” condition in one incident. Order the event chain by timestamp and prefer the first code produced at the lowest specific boundary over a later player-level summary.

Diagnostic sequence

  1. After you follow the issuer/service-supported restore policy or obtain new rights, verify both the requested right and the final store/device state.

Correcting the producing condition

Resolve the underlying condition directly: follow the issuer/service-supported restore policy or obtain new rights. A player reinstall, reboot or new license request is useful only when it changes the condition “restore fraud” and can be verified against the original evidence.

Representative case: Repeated restoration attempts for the same protected rights trigger fraud controls.

Actions that do not prove a fix

  • Avoid repeatedly resetting or restoring until anti-fraud limits are reached.
  • Avoid merging files from different backup sets or inventing request identifiers.

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.

Exit mobile version