Site icon EfmSoft

What does HRESULT 0xC80001F5 (hrLogFileCorrupt) mean?

 
Previous Next
hrFLDTooManySegments hrNoBackupDirectory

hrLogFileCorrupt

What this return value changes

For hrLogFileCorrupt, this result identifies a specific state transition rather than a generic “database failure.” The decisive boundary is ESE detected structural or checksum corruption while reading a transaction log.

The stored Value is 0xC80001F5 (negative JET error -501; -501). The HRESULT carries failure severity, so output state must be treated according to the individual API contract. Current ESE documentation uses JET_errLogFileCorrupt for the corresponding published JET condition.

The first useful distinction is that a bad signature identifies lineage/header mismatch; log corruption can also occur inside an otherwise correctly named file. Start by preserve the exact generation, file hash, offset or sector, log header, storage events, and whether the file came from live storage or backup. That separates a reproducible incident from a later generic cleanup or service error.

Objects and state involved

Diagnostic layertransaction-log format, checksum, version, and sequence identity
Relevant API surfaceJetInit soft recovery, hard recovery, log backup, and log replay
Code-specific boundaryESE detected structural or checksum corruption while reading a transaction log
Narrow corrective directionstop modifying the set, obtain a verified copy from the same lineage, and rerun recovery from a clean restore copy

ESE uses write-ahead logs to reconstruct a transaction-consistent database after an unclean shutdown., a log filename is not enough; header signature, generation, version, and contents must agree.

Evidence worth preserving

Preserve the first result before retries, cleanup, service restart, or file replacement changes the evidence. The diagnostic record should identify the exact API phase and the owner of every handle or artifact involved.

Use hashes, lengths, IDs, generation numbers, and redacted samples instead of copying directory contents or sensitive database values into routine logs. For this it investigation, a complete provenance chain is often more useful than a second automatic retry.

How to distinguish nearby results

It specifically means that a bad signature identifies lineage/header mismatch; log corruption can also occur inside an otherwise correctly named file. Related values below can appear in the same workflow but require a different response:

hrLogBufferTooSmallthe available recovery log buffer cannot hold the log record or sector data required for replay
hrBadLogVersionthe transaction log format is incompatible with the ESE version attempting to read it
hrInvalidBackupan incremental external backup was requested while circular logging prevents preservation of the required historical log range

Keep the original constant and hexadecimal value in telemetry. Replacing it with “backup failed” or “database warning” removes the state information needed to select the next legal API call.

A safe response sequence

  1. Record it, 0xC80001F5, the API name, the current phase, and all live context or file owners.
  2. Verify the decisive condition by preserve the exact generation, file hash, offset or sector, log header, storage events, and whether the file came from live storage or backup.
  3. Apply only the narrow correction: stop modifying the set, obtain a verified copy from the same lineage, and rerun recovery from a clean restore copy.
  4. After it, recreate any context invalidated by the failure; do not carry stale HBC, cursor, file, or restore-map state into the retry.
  5. repeat the smallest non-destructive test that reaches the same boundary, then verify both the return value and the resulting file, cursor, backup, or database state.

Actions that can make diagnosis worse

Acceptance criteria for a fix

A useful regression test for this HRESULT should force the condition “ESE detected structural or checksum corruption while reading a transaction log”, call one documented API transition, and assert the exact HRESULT. The corrected the case should change only the decisive precondition and should verify cleanup as well as the primary output. For the result backup or restore path, also prove that the resulting set can be enumerated and that no file handle or context remains active after finalization.

Technical references


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.

Exit mobile version