Site icon EfmSoft

What does Windows error code 13025 (WARNING_IPSEC_QM_POLICY_PRUNED) mean?

 
Previous Next
WARNING_IPSEC_MM_POLICY_PRUNED ERROR_IPSEC_IKE_NEG_STATUS_BEGIN

WARNING_IPSEC_QM_POLICY_PRUNED

The Quick Mode policy was successfully added, but some of the requested offers are not supported.

Windows assigns decimal 13025 and hexadecimal 0x000032E1 to WARNING_IPSEC_QM_POLICY_PRUNED. The constant belongs to Windows IPsec, IKE, and AuthIP policy processing; its name is not enough to identify the affected directory object, DNS zone, policy, installer, package, or resource context.

Operational meaning

The key question is whether the effective Quick Mode offer set still contains acceptable data-protection algorithms and lifetimes. The value describes addition of an IPsec Quick Mode policy with unsupported offers removed; it does not prove that the whole domain, DNS service, network, servicing stack, application package, or operating system has failed.

Likely impact: Traffic can be protected successfully while the effective cryptographic choices differ from the requested policy. Record the scope that was actually tested instead of escalating from one rejected object or phase to a system-wide outage.

Where the result appears

Typical causes

Diagnostic sequence

  1. capture it immediately after the failing or status-returning call and record whether the API uses Win32, DNS_STATUS, HRESULT conversion, or callback semantics.
  2. identify the exact target involved in addition of an IPsec Quick Mode policy with unsupported offers removed, including stable GUIDs, DNs, zone names, package identities, file hashes, policy names, or process identifiers as applicable.
  3. prove the state boundary: the effective Quick Mode offer set still contains acceptable data-protection algorithms and lifetimes.
  4. collect requested and effective Quick Mode offers and ESP/AH algorithms and lifetimes before restarting services, deleting objects, rebuilding packages, or changing policy.
  5. correlate PFS settings with IKEEXT operational events, Windows Filtering Platform events, IPsec security audits, policy export, peer configuration, and packet capture.
  6. determine whether the result is a failure, warning, informational completion, continuation request, or marker constant before choosing retry behavior.
  7. after changing one responsible condition, repeat the same smallest operation and verify both success and absence of unintended partial effects.

Evidence to preserve

Correlate this evidence with IKEEXT operational events, Windows Filtering Platform events, IPsec security audits, policy export, peer configuration, and packet capture. Preserve raw identifiers and the first detailed diagnostic: translating everything to 13025 can hide whether the cause was validation, topology, authorization, replication, policy, file I/O, packaging, or an intentional continuation state.

Recovery and retry

The recovery objective for it is to compare the installed offers with the intended security baseline and replace unsupported combinations; do not treat the warning as a complete rollback.

Retry only after the recorded boundary changes and prior completion is known. Read-only discovery for it can usually be repeated with bounded backoff; directory mutations, DNS updates, policy installation, servicing actions, and PRI writes require a state check first. Backoff for it cannot repair malformed input, unsupported structure, identity collision, missing authority, or incompatible package metadata.

Telemetry and support fields

A support bundle for it should include decimal 13025, hexadecimal 0x000032E1, the smallest reproducible request, target identity, effective configuration, and evidence from the owning Windows component. When documenting it, remove secrets from exported logs but keep SIDs, GUIDs, package-family names, record types, and hashes when they are needed to distinguish objects.

Difference from nearby results

WARNING_IPSEC_MM_POLICY_PRUNED concerns Main Mode negotiation; this warning concerns traffic-protection offers after peer establishment This distinction determines whether the correct next step is input correction, topology repair, continuation, policy review, package rebuild, or no error handling at all.

Practical validation scenario

A template requests three Quick Mode suites, one unsupported. The remaining two install, and a test SA confirms which suite peers actually negotiate. A negative test should reproduce it with the responsible condition preserved; the recovery test should alter only that condition and confirm the intended final state.

Developer and administrator guidance

Developers should model it explicitly in the result domain instead of collapsing every nonzero value into “failed.” Administrators should capture evidence before destructive remediation and use the component that owns addition of an IPsec Quick Mode policy with unsupported offers removed. Monitoring for it should suppress range markers and classify warning, informational, cancellation, and continuation values separately from terminal failures.

References


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.

Exit mobile version