| Previous | Next |
| ERROR_DEVICE_ALREADY_ATTACHED | ERROR_PROFILING_NOT_STARTED |
ERROR_INSTRUCTION_MISALIGNMENT
What this result means
ERROR_INSTRUCTION_MISALIGNMENT is a Windows system result. The processor attempted to execute an instruction from an address that does not meet the architecture alignment requirements. This usually points to a damaged control-flow target rather than an ordinary data-alignment problem.
Why it can appear
- a corrupted return address, function pointer, vtable, or jump table redirected execution
- binary patching or generated code emitted an invalid entry address
- mixed instruction-set modes or architecture assumptions selected the wrong target
- memory corruption modified executable code or unwind state
Diagnostic workflow
- capture a crash dump with registers, faulting address, module map, and nearby bytes
- verify whether the address falls inside a valid executable section and on a legal instruction boundary
- inspect the call stack for corruption and validate indirect-call targets
- check JIT, hook, instrumentation, and hot-patching components
Correct recovery and handling
Treat this as a software-integrity or memory-corruption defect. Restarting may hide the symptom but does not repair the cause. Update or remove the faulty module and use memory diagnostics when hardware corruption is plausible.
Administrator and support checklist
- confirm whether the condition is isolated to one machine, one user, one file, or one application build.
- Compare the host reporting this result with a known-good system using the same Windows edition and policy.
- Review updates, drivers, security-policy changes, restores, and infrastructure incidents that preceded this result.
- Preserve logs and dumps associated with this result before rebooting when the failure may be intermittent or destructive.
- Use vendor-supported repair or rollback steps for this Win32 error instead of copying system files or disabling protections ad hoc.
Developer guidance
When handling it, log the API or subsystem that returned it, the first lower-level failure, relevant object identifiers, process and thread context, and safe operation parameters. Preserve the original numeric Value rather than converting it to an unrelated HRESULT or NTSTATUS. Retry it only when the evidence shows a transient dependency; deterministic it cases involving policy, format, compatibility, or integrity should fail fast.
What to record in telemetry
- Windows build, architecture, and component version for the result event
- the first result timestamp and the operation then in progress
- process, thread, session, and target object associated with it
- warnings or lower-layer status values immediately preceding it
- whether retry, restart, rollback, or repair changed the result outcome
Example investigation pattern
Investigate it by reproducing the operation once with detailed logging, then correlate that timestamp with Windows events and lower-layer traces. Compare the affected object or process with a known-good one, change one variable at a time, and stop retrying When it is deterministic. That method keeps the first relevant failure from being hidden by secondary cleanup messages.
Related and easily confused conditions
Data misalignment errors involve reading or writing operands; instruction misalignment concerns the address from which the CPU fetches code. The distinction changes what evidence to collect.
Operational note
Do not diagnose it from its text alone. The result can cross subsystem boundaries and may summarize an earlier, more specific event. The first failure in time is normally more useful than the last message printed during cleanup.
References
Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.