What does HRESULT 0x8009035D (SEC_E_INVALID_PARAMETER) mean?

 
Previous Next
SEC_E_KDC_CERT_REVOKED SEC_E_DELEGATION_POLICY

SEC_E_INVALID_PARAMETER

SEC_E_INVALID_PARAMETER should be read at the SSPI buffer or context contract boundary. An SSPI call received an invalid handle, flag combination, SecBuffer layout, target name, structure version, or package-specific argument. The useful diagnostic question is which concrete object and operation caused Windows to select this exact HRESULT—not whether a key, certificate, account, file, or device merely “works.”

Where the status is selected

In the path, SSPI calls combine handles, flags, target names, and arrays of SecBuffer entries whose types and lengths depend on the handshake stage. Capture the entire call contract, including structure versions and whether input and output descriptors are distinct where required in an SSPI buffer or context contract investigation.

Evidence that changes the diagnosis

RecordWhy it matters for this code
SSPI function, package, credential and context handles, target name, and request flagsIn the path, pINs the result to a specific handshake or KDC decision.
Every SecBuffer type, address, byte count, and descriptor versionSeparates identity proof from delegation or transport policy.
The preceding return code and whether the package expected another token exchangeKeeps target names, package selection, and context state comparable.

Code-specific checks:

  • Log the security package, API, requested context attributes, and every SecBuffer type and length.
  • Check first-call versus continuation-call rules for phContext, input tokens, and output buffers.
  • Validate lifetime and cleanup of credential and context handles across multi-leg negotiation.

What to include in an escalation package

Authentication failures are multi-leg transactions. Align client SSPI calls, DNS and target-name resolution, policy refresh, domain-controller or KDC events, ticket acquisition, server acceptance, and any proxy or TLS transition., a single application timestamp is not enough to tell whether the decision was local policy, peer identity, context state, or KDC behavior.

  • Package and target name, requested and returned context attributes, and each SSPI return in order.
  • In the path, relevant Group Policy result, SPN or UPN resolution, contacted DC/KDC, and ticket or certificate identities.
  • One permitted control target and one deliberately rejected target evaluated with the same client build in this condition investigation.

A controlled way to reproduce it

In the path, reduce the exchange to the documented minimal buffer set for the selected package. Add optional channel bindings, package parameters, and application buffers one by one while recording returned context attributes in this condition investigation.

  1. Preserve the original input, identity, provider or protocol selection, and first return Value.
  2. Use one known-good control that changes only the suspected part of this path.
  3. Reverse the comparison with known-good input on the failing layer where that can be done safely.
  4. Record where behavior first diverges in this path instead of judging only by the final application message.

Nearby results and misleading fixes

Do not interpret this as bad user credentials until the SSPI call contract has been verified. Replacing the target name or package at the same time as fixing buffers can hide which argument violated the contract in this condition investigation.

Also retain the original numeric value; neighboring constants can encode materially different remediation paths even when an application presents all of them as an authentication, certificate, or security failure.

What counts as a real resolution

The original package must accept the documented buffer layout and complete the intended handshake with the required context attributes in this condition investigation. Keep a regression case that uses nonsecret identifiers and expected outcomes, including one negative control that must continue to fail.

Technical references

These sources define the HRESULT and the relevant relevant interface, protocol, or data format.


Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.