| Previous | Next |
| RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_KEY | RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_USER |
RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_NAME
Where the state changes: RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_NAME
Diagnosis begins inside creating or enabling an XML profile that defines user identity, servers, transports, authentication, and supported session types, where the decisive condition for this HRESULT is the provisioning profile omits the required name field.
The numeric form of this result is 0x80EE0031 in the RTC interface facility 0xEE; an exception translator handling it should preserve this value before converting it into application-facing call or presence states.
The quickest way to localize this result is to parse the profile with schema-aware diagnostics and identify the owning provision, user, server, or session element; the important the boundary is that a missing field differs from a present field whose value or cross-field combination is invalid.
Telemetry and packet evidence
The earliest callback or return site is the most valuable; later this result cleanup can replace the original state, so correlate the code with the object generation that produced it.
- Code-specific proof for this HRESULT: parse the profile with schema-aware diagnostics and identify the owning provision, user, server, or session element.
- Addressing context for this HRESULT: user URI and profile key hash.
- RTC callback state for this HRESULT: server role/address/transport.
- Transaction boundary for this HRESULT: authentication method.
- Media or profile detail for this HRESULT: session type and party attributes.
A useful this result trace does not require communication content or secrets; in the result record, keep structural metadata and correlation identifiers while removing passwords, authorization material, complete numbers, and private presence data.
Protocol and object boundary
| RTC area | RTC provisioning profile validation boundary |
|---|---|
| Condition to prove | the provisioning profile omits the required name field |
| Objects to correlate | profile XML, provision/user/server/session elements, registrar and proxy roles, transport and authentication method |
| Safe corrective direction | supply the authoritative name value and regenerate the profile rather than inserting a guessed placeholder |
CreateProfile validates the provisioning schema and cross-field constraints; a field can be present yet still be unusable with the chosen transport or role; the second rule relevant to it is that The enabled profile selected for a call must support both the destination and the requested session type.
Actions that do not address this condition
- The following shortcut is unsafe for this HRESULT: do not log passwords or provisioning secrets from profile XML.
- also do not insert placeholder values solely to pass schema validation.
- Do not discard the result facility and state boundary when converting the result into application telemetry.
Step-by-step isolation
- At the source of it, preserve the HRESULT, method or callback, timestamp, thread/task correlation, and object generation.
- reconstruct the immediately preceding RTC transition instead of beginning with the later disconnect or UI notification.
- use protocol and object evidence to parse the profile with schema-aware diagnostics and identify the owning provision, user, server, or session element.
- confirm the distinction that a missing field differs from a present field whose value or cross-field combination is invalid.
- create a fresh operation generation after you supply the authoritative name value and regenerate the profile rather than inserting a guessed placeholder, and compare its final state with the failing run.
The result diagnosis is strongest when object state and protocol trace share timestamps and transaction identifiers; when diagnosing it, avoid treating packet capture and HRESULT logging as substitutes for one another.
Remediation boundary
The corrective direction for this HRESULT is to supply the authoritative name value and regenerate the profile rather than inserting a guessed placeholder; for this HRESULT, cancellation, cleanup, and retry should remain with the component that owns the failed transition.
Distinguish local rejection from an operation that may already have reached the server; for this HRESULT, use transaction identifiers and final events before replaying any non-idempotent action.
Example for this HRESULT: A provisioning template creates a profile without name and RTC rejects it before the profile can be enabled.
Comparison with adjacent codes
The practical separator for this HRESULT is this: it is tied to the condition “the provisioning profile omits the required name field”; preserve that producing boundary before choosing recovery; for this HRESULT, compare that boundary with these related RTC values.
RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_USER | the provisioning profile omits the required user field |
|---|---|
RTC_E_PROFILE_NO_USER_URI | the provisioning profile omits the required user uri field |
RTC_E_PROFILE_SERVER_UNAUTHORIZED | the profile server address falls outside the domains authorized by provisioning policy |
Keeping it separate from these neighbors improves both user messaging and automated retry policy.
Verification after a fix
Verify the result fix with a minimal deterministic case that reaches “the provisioning profile omits the required name field”; the failing the case must assert the HRESULT and post-failure state; the passing case should alter one input and confirm both protocol outcome and cleanup.
Technical references
- IRTCClientProvisioning::CreateProfile — definitions relevant when reproducing it.
- IRTCProfile server fields — API or protocol rules used to interpret it.
- Microsoft RTC return constants — authoritative context for the boundary.
- SIP and TEL URLs — definitions relevant when reproducing it.
Looking for a different code? Search another status or error code.